Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5986
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Rena C.-
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorJakait, Beatrice-
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Bryan E.-
dc.contributor.authorMocello, A. Rain-
dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Bryan E.-
dc.contributor.authorMusick, Beverly-
dc.contributor.authorBernard, Caitlin-
dc.contributor.authorOnono, Maricianah-
dc.contributor.authorBukusi, Elizabeth A.-
dc.contributor.authorWools-Kaloustian, Kara-
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Craig R.-
dc.contributor.authorYiannoutsos, Constantin T.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-16T08:12:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-16T08:12:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-13-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02043-z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5986-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Preventing unintended pregnancies is paramount for women living with HIV (WLHIV). Previous studies have suggested that efavirenz-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces contraceptive effectiveness of implants, but there are uncertainties regarding the quality of the electronic medical record (EMR) data used in these prior studies. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of EMR data from 2011 to 2015 among WLHIV of reproductive age accessing HIV care in public facilities in western Kenya. We validated a large subsample of records with manual chart review and telephone interviews. We estimated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) with Poisson regression accounting for the validation sampling using inverse probability weighting and generalized raking. Results: A total of 85,324 women contributed a total of 170,845 women-years (w-y) of observation time; a subset of 5080 women had their charts reviewed, and 1285 underwent interviews. Among implant users, the aIRR of pregnancy for efavirenz- vs. nevirapine-containing ART was 1.9 (95% CI 1.6, 2.4) using EMR data only and 3.2 (95% CI 1.8, 5.7) when additionally using both chart review and interview validated data. Among efavirenz users, the aIRR of pregnancy for depomedroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) vs. implant use was 1.8 (95% CI 1.5, 2.1) in EMR only and 2.4 (95% CI 1.0, 6.1) using validated dataConclusion: Pregnancy rates are higher when contraceptive implants are concomitantly used with efavirenz containing ART, though rates were similar to leading alternative contraceptive methods such as DMPA. Our data provides policymakers, program staff, and WLHIV greater confidence in guiding their decision-making around contraceptive and ART options. Our novel, 3-phase validation sampling provides an innovative tool for using routine EMR data to improve the robustness of data quality.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmpathen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectWomen living with HIVen_US
dc.subjectContraceptionen_US
dc.subjectEfavirenzen_US
dc.subjectImplanten_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.titlePregnancies among women living with HIV using contraceptives and antiretroviral therapy in western Kenya: a retrospective, cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.