Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5403
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdwek, George-
dc.contributor.authorBoxiong, Shen-
dc.contributor.authorNdolo, Paul O.-
dc.contributor.authorSiagi, Zachary O.-
dc.contributor.authorChepsaigutt, Chebet-
dc.contributor.authorKemunto, Cicilia M.-
dc.contributor.authorArowo, Moses NyoTonglo-
dc.contributor.authorShimmon, John-
dc.contributor.authorSimiyu, Patrobers-
dc.contributor.authorYabo, Abel C.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-19T07:46:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-19T07:46:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00372-x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5403-
dc.description.abstractOnly a third of the people living in Sub-Saharan Africa have access to electricity. While the benefits of electricity services for the society continue to increase, solar home system (SHS) provides a long-term rural electrification and development solution. SHS is thought out to be a robust and cost-effective option for supplying basic electrification under Kenya’s metrological conditions. This paper begins with an in-depth justification of the need for SHS in rural areas, and then it presents an overview of SHS financing, benefits and barriers, followed by a crucial component of existing SHSs in Kenya, Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) technology. It ends with succinct analysis of the payment models highlighting the benefits, challenges and methods adopted in overcoming those challenges. Lessons from this review suggest that solar firms face a myriad of challenges operating in poor rural areas in Kenya; credit risk is a major concern for solar firms as well as financiers which makes payment models notably challenging. Technical performance of SHS is becoming well proven, and end users desire a wide range of component preferences and service levels that are of benefit. The challenges faced by solar firms using different payment models show that there is a dire need for integration of SHS with rural electrification policy in Kenya. The principal conclusion is that PAYG model offers the best option for SHS dissemination, though energy-as-a-service implementation has a great potential of improving the dissemination process in rural communities as it offers a promising mechanisms from a sustainability point of view.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.subjectEnergy povertyen_US
dc.subjectPay-As-You-Goen_US
dc.subjectSolar energyen_US
dc.subjectPoor local communitiesen_US
dc.titleThe solar energy access in Kenya: a review focusing on Pay-As-You-Go solar home systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.