Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5403
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Adwek, George | - |
dc.contributor.author | Boxiong, Shen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ndolo, Paul O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Siagi, Zachary O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chepsaigutt, Chebet | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kemunto, Cicilia M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Arowo, Moses NyoTonglo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shimmon, John | - |
dc.contributor.author | Simiyu, Patrobers | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yabo, Abel C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-19T07:46:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-19T07:46:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00372-x | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5403 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Only a third of the people living in Sub-Saharan Africa have access to electricity. While the benefits of electricity services for the society continue to increase, solar home system (SHS) provides a long-term rural electrification and development solution. SHS is thought out to be a robust and cost-effective option for supplying basic electrification under Kenya’s metrological conditions. This paper begins with an in-depth justification of the need for SHS in rural areas, and then it presents an overview of SHS financing, benefits and barriers, followed by a crucial component of existing SHSs in Kenya, Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) technology. It ends with succinct analysis of the payment models highlighting the benefits, challenges and methods adopted in overcoming those challenges. Lessons from this review suggest that solar firms face a myriad of challenges operating in poor rural areas in Kenya; credit risk is a major concern for solar firms as well as financiers which makes payment models notably challenging. Technical performance of SHS is becoming well proven, and end users desire a wide range of component preferences and service levels that are of benefit. The challenges faced by solar firms using different payment models show that there is a dire need for integration of SHS with rural electrification policy in Kenya. The principal conclusion is that PAYG model offers the best option for SHS dissemination, though energy-as-a-service implementation has a great potential of improving the dissemination process in rural communities as it offers a promising mechanisms from a sustainability point of view. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Netherlands | en_US |
dc.subject | Energy poverty | en_US |
dc.subject | Pay-As-You-Go | en_US |
dc.subject | Solar energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Poor local communities | en_US |
dc.title | The solar energy access in Kenya: a review focusing on Pay-As-You-Go solar home system | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | School of Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.