Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5160
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSitati, Noah W.-
dc.contributor.authorWalpole, Matthew J.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T08:52:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T08:52:15Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605306000834-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5160-
dc.description.abstractCrop raiding by elephants is widespread across Africa and Asia. Although many traditional and novel methods are used to defend farms there have been few rigorous tests of their efficacy. We provide a comparative quantitative assessment of a range of farm-based mitigation methods implemented during a 4-year project in Transmara District, Kenya. Five experimental trials were established to measure changes in crop raiding after the application of mitigation methods on treatment farms compared with control farms. A combination of early warning to detect elephants before they entered farms, coupled with a front line communal guarding strategy, proved most successful. Non-electrified barriers were expensive and generally ineffective. However, chilli Capsicum spp. grease applied to rope barriers encircling farms completely deterred elephants. Although encouraging, these results require more widespread testing and demonstration to ensure their effectiveness at broader scales.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University pressen_US
dc.subjectAfrican elephanten_US
dc.subjectCrop raidingen_US
dc.subjectHuman-wildlife conflicten_US
dc.subjectMitigation methodsen_US
dc.titleAssessing farm-based measures for mitigating human-elephant conflict in Transmara District, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Tourism, Hospitality and Events Management

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.