Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5024
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYamai, Benjamin M.-
dc.contributor.authorKweyu, Cleophas M.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-17T06:12:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-17T06:12:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5024-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we make a comparison between the Newton’s Cote’s quadrature method and Stirling quadrature method. The numerical quadrature rules related to the Stirling interpolation polynomial are developed as opposed to the commonly used Newton’s interpolation polynomial. This is done for the case n = 1 and n = 2. The Newton’s Cote’s and Stirling’s quadrature methods are compared by making good use of well known integrals for the two cases n = 1 and n = 2. It is found that the Newton Cote’s formula provides better accuracy than the Stirling’s quadrature formula.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectNumerical quadratureen_US
dc.subjectInterpolationen_US
dc.subjectForward difference operatoren_US
dc.subjectCentral difference operatoren_US
dc.titleNewton Cote’s Quadrature Method versus Stirling’s Quadrature Methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Biological and Physical Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
05-BenjaminM.NyamaiCleophasM.Kweyu.pdf200.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.