Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4790
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAyieko, James-
dc.contributor.authorAbuogi, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorSimchowitz, Brett-
dc.contributor.authorA Bukusi, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorH Smith, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorReingold, Arthur-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-08T08:31:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-08T08:31:07Z-
dc.date.issued2014-02-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4790-
dc.description.abstractChildren are highly susceptible to tuberculosis; thus, there is need for safe and effective preventive interventions. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of isoniazid in prevention of tuberculosis morbidity and mortality in children aged 15 years or younger by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis evaluating efficacy of isoniazid prophylaxis in prevention of tuberculosis in children. A systematic search of the literature was done to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating isoniazid prophylaxis efficacy among children. Each study was evaluated for relevance and validity for inclusion in the analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study quality, HIV status, tuberculosis endemicity, type of prophylaxis and age of participants. Eight studies comprising 10,320 participants were included in this analysis. Upon combining data from all eight studies, isoniazid prophylaxis was found to be efficacious in preventing development of tuberculosis, with a pooled RR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.47, 0.89) p = 0.004 , with confidence intervals adjusted for heterogeneity. Among the sub-group analyses conducted, only age of the participants yielded dramatic differences in the summary estimate of efficacy, suggesting that age might be an effect modifier of the efficacy of isoniazid among children, with no effect realised in children initiating isoniazid at four months of age or earlier and an effect being present in older children. Excluding studies in which isoniazid was initiated at four months of age or earlier yielded an even stronger effect (RR = 0.41 (95% CI 0.31, 0.55) p <0.001). Data on …en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjecttuberculosisen_US
dc.subjectisoniazid prophylacticen_US
dc.subjectmeta–analysisen_US
dc.subjectpreventive interventionsen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of isoniazid prophylactic therapy in prevention of tuberculosis in children: a meta–analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
James Ayieko aet al...pdf231.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.