Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4059
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOng’ondo, Charles Ochieng’-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T06:47:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-03T06:47:33Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4059-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I argue that when teacher education (TE) only aims at student teachers’ mastery of procedural knowledge, the envisaged intellectual development that teachers need so that they can, in turn, facilitate similar development in their learners cannot be realised. My argument is based on a study I conducted in Kenya, in which I investigated what English language student teachers learn during the practicum and the issues that influence their learning. Generally, the data showed that they mainly acquired procedural knowledge but failed to develop pedagogical reasoning, which - arguably - ought to be the main goal of TE.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Educational Practiceen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual developmenten_US
dc.subjectPedagogical reasoningen_US
dc.titlePedagogical reasoning in teacher education: The unexplored route to intellectual development – a study of the practicum in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Education

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Charles Ochieng’ Ong’ondo .pdf206.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.