Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3724
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWambua, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorIvens, Jan-
dc.contributor.authorVerpoest, Ignaas-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-03T10:52:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-03T10:52:58Z-
dc.date.issued2003-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3724-
dc.description.abstractIn this work, natural fibres (sisal, kenaf, hemp, jute and coir) reinforced polypropylene composites were processed by compression moulding using a film stacking method. The mechanical properties of the different natural fibre composites were tested and compared. A further comparison was made with the corresponding properties of glass mat reinforced polypropylene composites from the open literature. Kenaf, hemp and sisal composites showed comparable tensile strength and modulus results but in impact properties hemp appears to out-perform kenaf. The tensile modulus, impact strength and the ultimate tensile stress of kenaf reinforced polypropylene composites were found to increase with increasing fibre weight fraction. Coir fibre composites displayed the lowest mechanical properties, but their impact strength was higher than that of jute and kenaf composites. In most cases the specific properties of the natural fibre composites were found to compare favourably with those of glass.en_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectMechanical propertiesen_US
dc.subjectInterfacial strengthen_US
dc.subjectGlass fibres Natural fibresen_US
dc.titleNatural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Engineering

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.