Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3419
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOettingen, Julia E von-
dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Ophira-
dc.contributor.authorKishore, Sandeep P-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T07:58:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-13T07:58:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30039-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3419-
dc.description.abstractHeart attack, diabetes, cancer: these common clinical diagnoses can (and should) be confirmed with a diagnostic test. However, in large parts of the world, up-to-date, cost-effective, and simple diagnostic tools remain unavailable.1 Patients and health-care providers in such settings are often reliant on so-called syndromic medicine, whereby diagnoses are made on the basis of clinical judgment and treatment is administered empirically. This approach is less than ideal, because it carries the risk of misdiagnosis, unnecessary or harmful treatments, adverse sequelae, and even death.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLanceten_US
dc.subjectClinical diagnosesen_US
dc.titleThe AEIOU of essential diagnostics: align, expand, implement, oversee, and updateen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.