Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10445| Title: | Mechanical and durability properties of concrete with limestone calcined clay cement: assessing the suitability of Tanzanian kaolinite clay |
| Authors: | Okumu, Victoria Akoth Shitote, Stanley Muse Koteng, David Otieno Myamba, Yohakimu Jinifa |
| Keywords: | Low-clinker cement Durability Mechanical properties Kaolinite clay Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) |
| Issue Date: | Aug-2026 |
| Publisher: | MDPI |
| Abstract: | In most African countries, supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), such as silica fume, slag, and fly ash, are scarce, creating a need for alternative low-clinker cement that utilises locally abundant resources. Given the limited availability of SCMs, the development of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC3) has emerged as an attractive solution. LC3 is a blended binder composed of ground limestone, calcined kaolinite clay, and ordinary Portland cement clinker. This research assessed the mechanical and durability properties of LC3 binders formulated using raw materials obtained from selected deposits in Tanzania. Two samples of clay from the Pugu deposit were selected: Pugu hard clay (PH) and Pugu soft clay (PS). Limestone and gypsum were sourced from Dar es Salaam. LC3 mixes containing 58% CEM I/42.5N were produced and used to make concrete with a water/binder ratio of 0.4. Two control mixes were made, a mix with 100% Portland cement CEM I/42.5 N and a mix with 100% Portland pozzolana CEM II/P-B 42.5 N. In addition, four concrete mixes were designed for the study: LC3-PH, LC3-PS, CEM I + PH (CC-PH), and CEM I + PS (CC-PS). The mechanical properties evaluated included compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength, whilst durability performance was assessed through sulfuric acid resistance, water sorptivity, and absorption. The results demonstrated the superiority of LC3 concrete compared to CEM I and CEM II concretes. For instance, the LC3-PS mix achieved a 90-day compressive strength of 63 ± 2.1 MPa, compared with 62 ± 1.8 MPa for CEM I. Similarly, water absorption was 1.35% and 1.1% for CEM I and LC3 concretes, respectively. Under sulfuric acid exposure, LC3 concrete exhibited the lowest mass loss (1.6%) and strength loss (17.9%) compared with 2.4% and 23% for CEM I and 2.1% and 21% for CEM II, respectively. The enhanced performance of LC3 concrete was attributed to its denser and more refined microstructure, which reduced pore connectivity and improved resistance to the ingress of aggressive agents. |
| URI: | file:///home/systems/Downloads/constrmater-06-00052.pdf http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10445 |
| Appears in Collections: | School of Engineering |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.