Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10398
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKongo, Yabesh Ombwori-
dc.contributor.authorKitum, Lydia Jeptoo-
dc.contributor.authorNdambiri, Hillary-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-27T07:26:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-27T07:26:56Z-
dc.date.issued2026-07-
dc.identifier.urifile:///home/systems/Downloads/19.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10398-
dc.description.abstractRenewable energy is important for enhancing energy accessibility, supporting broader development goals, and ensuring environmental sustainability. This study investigates the influence of four types of renewable energy, namely solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal energy, on energy accessibility in Kenya, guided by the Energy Justice Theory and Energy Stacking Theory. An explanatory research design was adopted using annual secondary data from 1990 to 2023 sourced from the World Bank, IEA, KNBS, and EPRA. Hypotheses were tested through an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model with lag order selected using information criteria. The estimated ARDL (4,4,4,1,4) model reveals that renewable energy sources significantly influence energy accessibility in both the short and long run. Long-run results show that solar energy exerts a positive and statistically significant effect on energy accessibility (β = 73.8975, p = 0.002), hydroelectric energy shows a positive and significant effect (β = 0.8807, p < 0.001), and geothermal energy similarly contributes positively (β = 0.1360, p < 0.001). In contrast, wind energy exhibits a negative and statistically significant long-run relationship (β = -0.2623, p = 0.023), attributed to grid integration challenges and intermittency. The error correction term is negative and significant (β = -5.472, p < 0.001), confirming rapid adjustment to long-run equilibrium. Diagnostic tests confirm that the model is well specified, showing normality, no multicollinearity, homoscedasticity, and no serial correlation. The model explains 97.57% of variation in energy accessibility (R² = 0.9757). The study recommends strengthening pay-as-you-go solar models, upgrading transmission infrastructure in wind-rich regions such as Turkana, modernising hydroelectric infrastructure with climate-smart planning, and accelerating geothermal exploration through concessional financing and private partnershipsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Economics, Finance and Management Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSolar energyen_US
dc.subjectARDL Modelen_US
dc.subjectEnergy accessibilityen_US
dc.subjectRenewable energyen_US
dc.titleRenewable energy consumption and energy accessibility in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Business and Economics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.