Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10152
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJaguga, Florence-
dc.contributor.authorTurissini, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorKamaru Kwobah, Edith-
dc.contributor.authorApondi, Edith-
dc.contributor.authorA. Enane, Leslie-
dc.contributor.authorBarasa, Julius-
dc.contributor.authorKosgei, Gilliane-
dc.contributor.authorOlando, Yvonne-
dc.contributor.authorA. Ott, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorKimaina, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorC. Aalsma, Matthew-
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-30T07:13:11Z-
dc.date.available2026-03-30T07:13:11Z-
dc.date.issued2026-03-16-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/10152-
dc.description.abstractBackground Youth in sub-Saharan Africa are at high risk of substance use yet lack access to appropriate interventions. The goal of this project was to evaluate the feasibility of a definitive trial to explore efficacy of a peer-delivered single-session brief intervention (SSBI) for youth with substance use in Kenya. Methods Seventy youth aged 15−24 years with moderate risk substance use were randomized to SSBI or to psychoeducation. Data was collected at baseline and month three. Pri- mary outcomes: Feasibility criteria, e.g., study participation rate, proportion of partici- pants willing to be randomized, and study completion rate. Strategies for recruitment in a future trial were collected using focus group discussions with the youth at month three. Secondary outcomes: (i) Change in substance use (Alcohol, Smoking & Sub- stance Use Involvement Screening Test for Youth [ASSIST-Y] questionnaire), depres- sion (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7 scale]), and quality of life (World Health Organization-Quality of Life BriefVersion [WHO-QOL BREF]) scores between baseline and month 3; (ii) Fidelity to the intervention assessed using fidelity checklists. Results This pilot met most of the predefined minimum requirements for feasibility. For instance, 96.9% of those meeting eligibility criteria consented to participate (bench- mark was 80%), and 100% of those who consented were willing to be randomized to either study arm. Youth reported that young people who use substances can be most effectively recruited from community settings. The SSBI showed a small effect on reducing total ASSIST-Y (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] −0.33 95% Con- fidence Interval [CI] −0.83,0.16) scores in the intervention group compared to the control. There was a moderate improvement in the quality of life for the intervention group compared to the control (SMD −0.41 CI −0.91,0.09). The intervention had no effect on depression (SMD 0.23 CI −0.27,0.72) and anxiety symptoms (SMD 0.70 CI 0.19,1.2) at month 3. Conclusion It is feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered SSBI for youth with moderate risk substance use in Kenya.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOS.ONEen_US
dc.subjectPeer-delivereden_US
dc.subjectModerate risken_US
dc.subjectPilot feasibilityen_US
dc.subjectYOUTHen_US
dc.titleA pilot randomized controlled trial to explore the feasibility of a peer-delivered single-session brief intervention for youth with moderate risk substance useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
kwobah.pdf902.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.