<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/21</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 10:41:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-22T10:41:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Economic Valuation of Riparian Habitats Protection in Nairobi County Kenya</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9424</link>
      <description>Title: Economic Valuation of Riparian Habitats Protection in Nairobi County Kenya
Authors: Magembe, Esther Machana
Abstract: Riparian habitats (RH) provide aesthetic beauty, clean water and environment among others. Despite&#xD;
these values, RH have been threatened and destroyed by effects of human encroachment among others.&#xD;
RH functioning has been hindered despite various state interventions towards RH protection. The&#xD;
habitats have continued to act as dumpsites. From literature, no study has valued RH protection in&#xD;
Kenya. Therefore, this study aimed to carry out economic valuation of RH protection in Nairobi County,&#xD;
Kenya. Specific study objectives were to determine the effect of changes in: Elicitation Format (EF), Bid&#xD;
Range (BR), Payment Vehicle (PV) and the Valuation Good (VG) all on valuation estimates. Welfare&#xD;
economics and utility maximization theories were utilized. Contingent valuation method (CVM) elicited&#xD;
households‘ willingness to pay (WTP) and its standard deviation (SD). 16 locations were purposively&#xD;
selected for study and stratified into 2 subsamples based on EF, with each subsample further stratified&#xD;
into public and private categories.Within these categories, there were six strata each (Trust, Tax, Raised&#xD;
bid, Lowered bid, Public good, Private good). Stratified proportionate random sampling was used to&#xD;
sample 1000 households. Cross–sectional survey design and experimental cards (Stochastic payment&#xD;
card (SPC) and multiple bound discrete choice (MBDC) generated the data. Primary and secondary data&#xD;
sources were used. Data were collected through structured questionnaires. Two stage random valuation&#xD;
model aided data analysis. Data were processed in STATA and subjected to Mann- Whitney test (MWT)&#xD;
and F test statistics. 64% of households were male, older (&gt;38 years) with mean income of KES.&#xD;
50,444/Month. 71.8% of households attained post college education level and had smaller family sizes&#xD;
(&lt;4 households) hence found it necessary to protect RH (95%). SPC households expressed lower but&#xD;
consistent WTP values (KES.925.1±48.3) at (p&lt;0.01; MWT=2.717), indicating that such households&#xD;
would consistently make their payments towards protection. Change in EF from SPC to MBDC&#xD;
increased both WTP and its SD by 6.7% and 9.8 % respectively at p&lt;0.01. Raised BR exhibited higher&#xD;
and consistent WTP (KES.1166.6±1003.3). A finding contrary to economic theory where WTP rise with&#xD;
reduction in bid amounts. Regression of change in BR on its estimates, increased WTP and reduced SD&#xD;
respectively by 23.7% and 19.4% at p&lt;0.01. Tax PV showed higher WTP and SD&#xD;
(KES.1180.93.1±1332.6) at (p&lt;0.1; MWT=1.865), evidence that it does not elicit protest responses as&#xD;
noted in the literature. The view of RH as public good elicited higher and inconsistent WTP (KES.&#xD;
1022.1±1318.5) at p&gt;0.01. Regression of change in VG from Private to Public on VG estimates&#xD;
increased both WTP and SD by 9.9% and 7.9% respectively at p&lt;0.01. Factors: - Age, Distance, income,&#xD;
Necessity to protect RH, EF, significantly affected valuation estimates. In conclusion, households&#xD;
expressed positive WTP amounts towards RH protection. The participation of women, youth, and larger&#xD;
families in protection was limited hence need for sensitization. SPC proved desirable for future valuation&#xD;
given its understated welfare estimates. Change in BR led to households‘ true valuation of RH&#xD;
protection. Tax PV was preferred for valuation of RH protection due to the distrust expressed by&#xD;
households over the Trust fund. Households viewing RH as private expressed confident support for it. It&#xD;
is suggested that conservationists and natural resource management authorities, such as the Kenya&#xD;
National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), should focus on increasing the participation of&#xD;
women, youth, and larger families in RH protection efforts through targeted awareness campaigns.&#xD;
Incorporating SPC format in future RH valuation studies is essential for ensuring consistency in&#xD;
households' WTP estimates. Utilization of Lowered BR in future valuation studies could produce more&#xD;
accurate and motivating WTP estimates, particularly for areas like Karura Forest. County governments&#xD;
are encouraged to establish a voluntary environmental tax fund for RH protection, ensuring transparency&#xD;
to build public trust. The study also advocates for using tax preferences as a PV in future valuations of&#xD;
environmental goods and services. Leasing public RH by the government to private entities for enhanced&#xD;
protection is also encouraged. Moreover, VG estimates could inform budget and policy proposals for&#xD;
managing various public RH, with adjustments made to ensure socio-demographic equity. Finally, future&#xD;
RH protection strategies should be tailored to consider key factors such as age, distance, income, and&#xD;
perceived necessity, which significantly influence valuation estimates.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9424</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluating farmers’ preferences for sweet potato  variety traits in Western Kenya</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9419</link>
      <description>Title: Evaluating farmers’ preferences for sweet potato  variety traits in Western Kenya
Authors: Bett, William Kiprotich
Abstract: Despite the high investment put in place so far in developing high-yielding sweet&#xD;
potato varieties, their uptake by farmers in the country has been low. While both farm&#xD;
and farmer characteristics have influenced farmers' choice decisions for different crop&#xD;
varieties, the role of varietal traits has only received limited attention in the empirical&#xD;
literature. This study investigated farmers' preferences towards sweet potato variety&#xD;
traits in western Kenya (i.e., Busia, Bungoma Kakamega, and Vihiga Counties). More&#xD;
specifically, the study sought to assess farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for better&#xD;
quality sweet potato varietal traits; evaluate farmers' preference certainty and&#xD;
consistency in their choice decisions for sweet potato varietal traits; explore the role&#xD;
of preference variation in the choices made by farmers towards sweet potato variety&#xD;
traits and; finally, ascertain attribute non-attendance of the farmers in their choice&#xD;
decisions for sweet potato variety traits in the study area. The discrete choice&#xD;
experiment (DCE) approach was used to investigate these objectives. The empirical&#xD;
analysis was based on primary data collection from 400 randomly selected farmers in&#xD;
western Kenya (Busia, Bungoma, Kakamega, and Vihiga Counties). Functional&#xD;
estimations followed several models, namely: the multinomial logit (MNL), mixed&#xD;
multinomial logit (MXL), scaled multinomial logit (S-MNL), generalized&#xD;
multinomial logit (G-MNL), generalized mixed logit (G-MXL) and the equality&#xD;
constrained latent class (ECLC) models, which were estimated using Nlogit V&#xD;
software. Farmers, in the first objective, were willing to pay the highest amount for&#xD;
sweetness of the flesh attribute KES 334.70, P&lt;0.01) followed by tolerance attribute&#xD;
(KES 187.09, P&lt;0.05), yield level attribute (KES 137.58, P&lt;0.05), color of the flesh&#xD;
attribute (KES 100.85, P&lt;0.1) and maturity period attribute (KES 100.28, P&lt;0.05)&#xD;
respectively. As for the second objective, results showed that farmers were&#xD;
considerably specific about their preferences, with an average certainty score of 7.0&#xD;
on a scale of 0-10. They were also consistent in their choice behavior since they&#xD;
chose the same option on the second occasion as on the first occasion in 65.9% of the&#xD;
cases. Results of the third objective show significant preference variation in farmers'&#xD;
affinity towards Sweet Potato traits such as yield level, sweetness of the flesh, color&#xD;
of the flesh, maturity period, and price change. Similarly, the final fourth objective&#xD;
show survey results that ranked flesh color as the most ignored attribute from both&#xD;
stated (61.8%) and inferred (59.2%) attribute non-attendance. In conclusion, due to&#xD;
solid statistical evidence, all four null hypotheses of the study were rejected. The&#xD;
Kenya Agriculture and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) should consider&#xD;
the production of improved seed varieties (sweet potato breeding programs in&#xD;
Western Kenya) since sweet potato farmers were willing to pay positive amount of&#xD;
money to get sweet potatoes with high-quality attributes. At the National and County&#xD;
level, the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) should provide regular agricultural&#xD;
extension services to sweet potato farmers in Western Kenya. Respondents in the&#xD;
survey did not pay attention to all attributes when selecting sweet potato varietal&#xD;
traits, implying a need for researchers to take note of this phenomenon in future&#xD;
undertakings involving farmers. Sweet potato breeding research institutions, such as&#xD;
KALRO should use the findings of this study to support development of high-quality&#xD;
sweet potato varieties in Kenya by employing discrete choice approach; ostensibly&#xD;
choice certainty, choice consistency, preference variation, and attribute non-&#xD;
attendance of individual farmers.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9419</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Impact of adopting multiple agricultural technologies on nutrition outcome in east africa: a multinomial  endogenous switching regression approach</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7102</link>
      <description>Title: Impact of adopting multiple agricultural technologies on nutrition outcome in east africa: a multinomial  endogenous switching regression approach
Authors: k. levy, Kachilei
Abstract: Majority of the population of East African households are malnourished and much of the &#xD;
effort to address the problem of stunting, wasting and underweight have focused on &#xD;
interventions that are designed directly to address its immediate causes. It is expected that the &#xD;
adoption of multiple agricultural technologies such as improved beans varieties, bio-fortified &#xD;
maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and garden vegetable techniques can be a means by which &#xD;
malnourished rural households who may have less access to diverse meals, supplements, and &#xD;
fortified foods can enhance their balanced diet but malnutrition still remain a salient problem &#xD;
facing rural households in East Africa. This study determined the factors that affect the &#xD;
adoption of joint multi-agricultural technologies then analyze the impact of the best four &#xD;
combinations adopted in East Africa countries that is; improved beans variety, biofortified &#xD;
maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and use of garden vegetables techniques on the household &#xD;
nutrition outcome indicators of underweight (WAZ), wasting(WHZ) and stunting(HAZ). &#xD;
Where TC = base with no technology used, TC1 = Improved beans variety, biofortified maize &#xD;
variety, and grafted fruit trees, TC2 = Improved beans variety, biofortified maize variety, and &#xD;
garden vegetable techniques, TC3 = biofortified maize variety, garden vegetable techniques, &#xD;
and grafted fruit trees, TC4 = Improved beans variety, garden vegetable techniques, and &#xD;
grafted fruit trees. The study utilized a secondary household panel data of Kenya, Tanzania, &#xD;
and Uganda that was collected by IFRI for ten waves from 2007 to 2017 and each country &#xD;
with 500 households. This study utilized multinomial endogenous regression model so as to &#xD;
casual the impact of technology adoption and to correct for the self-selection bias. It was &#xD;
conceptualized that the decision to adopt a combination of multiple agricultural technologies &#xD;
(MATs) is modeled in consumer theory, specifically, a random utility framework. The latent &#xD;
model (U*jit) which describes the ith farmer’s behavior in adopting MATs j(j=1,...4) at time t &#xD;
over any alternative MATs combination was utilized in three stages. In the first stage, the &#xD;
analysis determined the factors for adopting multi-agricultural technologies using a &#xD;
multinomial endogenous switching regression. In the second stage, the inverse mills ration &#xD;
generated in stage one is used as linkage between adoption of technologies nutrition outcome, &#xD;
and on the third stage, the treatment effect was used to establish the relationship between &#xD;
adopters of the joint multiple agricultural technologies and non-adopters. The results show &#xD;
that year increase of the education of household head, general participation in community &#xD;
meetings and barazas increases the adoption of TC1 (45%), TC2 (44%), TC3 (25%), and TC4 &#xD;
(35%) respectively. The 1% percent increase in the adoption of joint technologies, the &#xD;
prevalence of stunting reduces by 17.4%, wasting 15.4%, and underweight by 16.8%. Results &#xD;
of the average treatment effects show that the households who adopted joint multiple &#xD;
agricultural technologies had a positive significant impact (HAZ β= .62, p&lt;0.01), WAZ (β = &#xD;
.72, p&lt;0.01), and WHZ (β = .74, p&lt;0.01) which improves the nutrition status by HAZ &#xD;
(103%), WAZ (87%), and WHZ (84%). The best technology combination was TC3 which &#xD;
impacted all nutrition outcome at the highest percentage HAZ (25.8%), WHZ (24.2%), and &#xD;
WAZ (25.3%). Kenya(reference) had a higher significant propensity of adoption hence higher &#xD;
impact on nutrition outcome than Uganda (β = -.128, p&lt;0.01) and Tanzania (β = -.155, &#xD;
p&lt;0.01). This study concludes that adoption of multiple agricultural technologies improves &#xD;
household nutrition outcome. The household that adopted the joint multiple agricultural &#xD;
technologies had systematically higher nutrition outcome than the households who did not &#xD;
adopt even after controlling for all confounding factors. Among the three countries Kenya has &#xD;
a higher significant propensity on nutrition outcome. This study offers insight to &#xD;
policymakers, researchers, and extension workers regarding the advancement of factors &#xD;
suitable for joint technology combination to be adopted by the East Africa households. &#xD;
Consequently, this study recommends that household should focus on adopting the multiple &#xD;
agricultural technologies to improve their nutrition status. And more so focus more on the &#xD;
combination of TC3 (Biofortified maize variety, garden vegetable techniques, and grafted &#xD;
fruit trees) since it was the combination with greatest impact on nutrition outcome.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7102</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Breeding objectives and breeding strategies for small ruminants in the tropics</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3708</link>
      <description>Title: Breeding objectives and breeding strategies for small ruminants in the tropics
Authors: Kosgey, Isaac Sanga
Abstract: Small ruminants (i.e., sheep and goats) are widespread in the tropics and are&#xD;
important to the subsistence, economic and social livelihoods of a large human&#xD;
population in these areas. The aim of this thesis was to identify the breeding&#xD;
objectives for tropical small ruminants, and to develop appropriate breeding&#xD;
strategies for their improvement. The results indicated that breed substitution and&#xD;
crossbreeding programmes involving temperate breeds are rarely successful due to&#xD;
incompatibility of the genotypes with the farmers’ breeding objectives and the&#xD;
production systems. Within-breed selection programmes utilizing indigenous breeds&#xD;
are likely to be more sustainable than breed substitution and crossbreeding. In&#xD;
addition,&#xD;
they&#xD;
help&#xD;
to&#xD;
maintain&#xD;
biodiversity.&#xD;
Indigenous&#xD;
genotypes&#xD;
were&#xD;
predominantly found among pastoral/extensive farmers and mixed crosses among&#xD;
smallholders. In general farmers perceived crosses less favourably than indigenous&#xD;
breeds for a range of traits. The effect was studied of including intangible benefits in&#xD;
the calculation of economic values of breeding goal traits. It resulted in increased&#xD;
values of traits related to longevity. Litter size and lambing frequency were more&#xD;
important traits in smallholder and pastoral production. 12-month live weight also&#xD;
featured prominently in pastoral production. Constraints to small ruminant&#xD;
productivity included low levels of management, disease and parasite challenge,&#xD;
inadequate feed and poor marketing. Nucleus breeding schemes are recommended&#xD;
to optimize the limited available resources. However, ‘interactive cycling screening’&#xD;
schemes would be more practical under village settings as the farmers are actively&#xD;
involved in genetic improvement, and minimal recording is required in the commercial&#xD;
flocks. A single nucleus could serve both the smallholder and pastoral production. In&#xD;
conclusion, it is prudent to examine the production system holistically, and involve&#xD;
the producer at every stage in the planning and operation of a breeding programme,&#xD;
integrating traditional knowledge, practices, behaviour and values.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3708</guid>
      <dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

