<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1428</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-20T08:58:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Second University in Kenya : Report of the Presidential Working Party</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9033</link>
      <description>Title: Second University in Kenya : Report of the Presidential Working Party
Authors: Republic of Kenya; Mackay, Colin B.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 1981 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9033</guid>
      <dc:date>1981-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Needs assessment to build International Research Ethics Capacity</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2741</link>
      <description>Title: A Needs assessment to build International Research Ethics Capacity
Authors: Sidle, John E; Were, Edwin; Wools-Kaloustian, Kara; Chuani, Christine; Salmon, Karen; Tierney, William M; Meslin, Eric M.
Abstract: International collaborators in biomedical sciences face ethical challenges in the design, review, and conduct of research. Challenges include differences in research ethics capacity, cultural differences in interpretation and application of ethical principles, and cooperation between ethics review boards at collaborating institutions. Indiana University School of Medicine (Indianapolis, USA) and Moi University Faculty of Health Sciences (Eldoret, Kenya) developed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to establish greater cooperation between their ethics review boards, followed by a joint needs assessment to assess barriers to implementing the MOU. Focus groups and interviews at each institution revealed that while each side verbalized understanding and respect for the other's culture, there were misunderstandings deeply rooted in each culture that could potentially derail the collaboration. Although the participants at each university agreed on the major principles and issues in research ethics and on the importance attributed to them, a more in-depth evaluation of the responses revealed important differences. Methods to address these misunderstandings are outlined in the recommended Best Practices.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2741</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Historical Background of Moi University</title>
      <link>http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1430</link>
      <description>Title: Historical Background of Moi University
Authors: Moi University</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 1984 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1430</guid>
      <dc:date>1984-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

